FACTUAL ACTIVITY RECORD · An activity record based on work that took place
Creating one model for publishing activity records
Using questions and changes as public units while separating evidence, editorial decisions, and publication clearance
Purpose
Publishing activities along the boundaries or counts of internal records would not tell readers what was questioned, changed, and verified. It could also blur the distinction between work that occurred and something currently published or available.
The goal was a content model that produces the same adopt, hold, or reject decision from the same source packet while keeping facts, interpretations, future plans, creative expression, and non-adoption distinct.
Implementation
A public unit was defined as one question, one decision shift, and one verified change. Internal work and change records remain sources, but their boundaries do not map directly to articles: duplicate sources are combined, while a source containing multiple questions is divided.
The display was separated into work Wiroh is undertaking and what visitors can currently verify on the site. Even an adopted activity candidate cannot be described as currently available without separate evidence of public-surface currentness and publication approval. Unavailable items do not become future promises or empty destinations.
The candidate schema records content class, evidence state, editorial decision, and clearance as independent axes. A candidate can be editorially ADOPTed while remaining at clearance_status=HOLD; unresolved rights, privacy, legal, reputation, or locale checks prevent implementation and publication.
- Distinguish
Fact,Interpretation,Future plan,Creative expression, andNot adopted. - Classify evidence as
current-verified,historical-verified,stale,external-unverified,insufficient, orprivate-or-prohibited. - Use
ADOPT,HOLD, andREJECTfor editorial decisions, separating a verified non-adoption outcome from the decision not to create a public unit. - Check source confidentiality, personal data, rights and licenses, AI-asset provenance and likeness, claim basis, human legal review, reputation, and locale as publication clearance fields.
Candidate decisions use one source packet containing the body, all comments, related change state and conversation, the current artifact, current role, governance and public boundaries, the check date, and any unverified range. No single indicator such as a title, open or closed state, application of a change, or comment count determines publication, completion, or current availability.
Formats were divided into a Card for one change, a Note for a before-and-after decision shift, a Record following a question to a verified outcome, and a Series containing at least three independently adoptable units. A call to action becomes active only when its purpose, wording, owner-confirmed destination, existence, and publication approval are all confirmed; every initial candidate used none.
Rendering diagram…
What was confirmed
Verification results
Applying the model across the available history reproduced decisions about combining and splitting sources, recording non-adoption, holding stale or externally unverified material, and providing no calls to action.
Private, unverified, stale, insufficient, and rights- or legal-unconfirmed information could not proceed to public copy, while editorial adoption remained separate from publication clearance.
The model, the current-narrative index, and the site narrative referenced the same section sequence, classifications, and publication boundary, and the diff check passed.
At the cutoff, the publication criteria and content model had been applied to the target. Human legal, compliance, and locale review and publication approval for individual candidates, public-copy authoring, and UI implementation were incomplete.
Basis for completion
The model work was complete when public units, the three decision axes, clearance, source packets, formats, the call-to-action policy, and the initial candidate mapping were integrated in one canonical model, reproduced decisions from actual history, and were applied across the related documents.