FACTUAL ACTIVITY RECORD · An activity record based on work that took place
Synchronizing the current status of published activity records
Replacing pre-publication wording with verified publication, locale, and review states while preserving historical boundaries
Purpose
Pre-publication wording remained in the current source of truth for activity records that were already public. The current values needed to match verified evidence so operators would not mistake completed checks for unfinished work.
The goal was to update only the review, locale, and publication states of seven published records while leaving their Japanese and English copy, claims, ordering, calls to action, and public boundaries unchanged and retaining the hold on unpublished candidates.
Implementation
Seven documents that manage the current state were inventoried for pre-publication terms, checks that still appeared incomplete, and descriptions of work still in progress. Historical observations and general rules for unpublished candidates were retained in forms distinguishable from current values.
- The review state of all seven published records was aligned with the verified result.
- The current values now reflect that the Japanese and English public copy completed human locale review.
- Content readiness and actual publication are explicitly recorded as verified outcomes.
Headings and descriptions that still indicated a candidate or pre-publication state were updated to wording consistent with the current published state. General rules preventing future candidates from being treated as automatically publishable, and the hold on unpublished candidates, were left unchanged.
The Japanese and English activity copy, central claims, message hierarchy, three-part display order, and no-additional-call-to-action policy were excluded from the change. Before-and-after comparisons and cross-document searches confirmed that this was a status-only update.
- Current facts were explicitly separated from pre-publication states retained as history.
- Existing legal and rights reservations were not reclassified as resolved or safe.
- The boundary requiring renewed review when facts change was preserved instead of reusing past conclusions.
The first review found two remaining uses of candidate wording in post-publication documents. The heading and shared-description state were corrected, the evidence mapping was aligned with its confirmed state, and the full cross-document check was run again.
The current master retained historical candidate states while synchronizing the current state of published records separately. The description generalizes the internal record label.
Rendering diagram…
What was confirmed
Verification results
Across the target documents, all seven published records were consistently marked ready, public, and human-locale-reviewed.
Fourteen Japanese and English activity-copy blocks, fourteen message-table rows, the three-part display order, the no-additional-call-to-action policy, and the hold on unpublished candidates were unchanged.
The two stale state terms found in the first review were corrected, and the follow-up review found no new issues.
Document links, Markdown, cross-document state searches, and difference formatting checks passed.
At the cutoff, the status synchronization had been applied to the target and its completion conditions were satisfied. The full set of public URLs was not independently revisited, and no new substantive judgment was made about individual assets, contracts, or jurisdictions.
Basis for completion
The work was complete when the current states of all seven published records matched verified evidence, public copy and unpublished-candidate boundaries remained intact, and the final cross-document check passed after stale state terms were corrected.