FACTUAL ACTIVITY RECORD · An activity record based on work that took place
Refocusing verification on current system semantics
Checking runtime and security boundaries directly instead of freezing absent legacy structures
Purpose
Continuous verification needed to check current runtime, delivery targets, security, and privacy boundaries instead of permanently asserting that retired structures remained absent.
Implementation
Absence checks for old routes, assets, source layouts, and workflow patterns were removed. Redirect rejection moved to behavioral tests, infrastructure permissions to plan policy, and delivery, database, and Control Center checks were narrowed to current responsibilities. Major scripts gained documentation of purpose, assumptions, external access, and failure conditions.
### ソースコードの説明コメント
- JavaScript／TypeScriptの説明コメントは、TSDoc形式（`/** ... */`）を使用し、日本語で記述してください。PythonはPEP 8のスタイルとPEP 257のdocstring規約に準拠し、日本語で記述してください。その他の言語では、その言語固有のdocumentation comment形式を使用し、日本語で同等の内容を記述してください。
- 各ソースファイルの冒頭には、そのファイルの目的、処理の全体像、主な副作用を説明する概要コメントを記載してください。Pythonではshebang／encoding宣言の後にmodule docstringを置き、その他の言語でも実行上先頭に置く必要がある記述の直後へ、対象言語で有効なdocumentation comment形式を使用して記載してください。Rendering diagram…
What was confirmed
Verification results
Full verification, Worker dry-run, infrastructure formatting and validation, Data API, Control Center, and ten plan-policy tests passed.
The target now checks current behavior and safety boundaries rather than historical structural snapshots.
Basis for completion
The work was complete when only meaningful current-system checks remained and standard tools plus behavioral tests verified the safety boundaries.