FACTUAL ACTIVITY RECORD · An activity record based on work that took place
Fixing the meaning while opening up the site's language
Using a semantic contract to shape the AI Talent name and language for how an organization functions
Purpose
The input for the site copy had fixed the final choice of words too tightly. The work needed to restore room for the Scenario Writer to shape natural Japanese while preserving the Narrative Story, message architecture, facts, structure, and truth boundaries.
The CEO specifically asked the team to reconsider the Japanese terms for “AI employee” and “company building,” compare AI Talent and other Wiroh-specific expressions, and focus on how roles, handoffs, review, revision, and collaboration make a team or organization function rather than on the corporate vessel itself. English, legal judgment, URLs, design, implementation, and publication remained outside this Activity.
Implementation
The input owned by Shiori was recast from a list of exact wording into a semantic contract. Shiori fixed the Narrative Story, message architecture, meaning, facts and claims, structure, truth status, public and legal boundaries, and continuity. Sosuke owned naming, vocabulary, natural Japanese, style, rhythm, headlines, body copy, calls to action, and state copy. This division let the expression improve without changing the meaning or actual authority.
The order of six information categories in the global navigation and nine sections on Home was preserved, while their visible labels remained open to wording changes. Forty-two copy units were classified as meaning-fixed but wording-open, historical baseline requiring renewed approval, pending a source, retained from reality, not applicable, or blocked. The contract also prevented the work from filling in English, legal language, or unconfirmed destinations.
Five public naming candidates and five Hero candidates were compared. “AI Talent” was recommended as the primary category, with “Wiroh's AI Talent” for first mention and metadata, accompanied by a first-use explanation that each is an AI persona with a role and responsibility. The Hero was designed as an integrated eyebrow, headline, and supporting body, with the Japanese headline meaning “Roles connect, and expression begins to move.” Because that line alone does not identify AI or the organizational experiment, the artifact required it to remain connected to the surrounding copy.
- The abstract idea of “company building” was made concrete through organizational functions: choosing, handing off, reviewing, revising, and collaborating.
- AI Talent remained distinct from a human, a real person, or a new authority, while important decisions and final accountability remained with the human CEO.
- Facts, narrative premises, hypotheses, dramatization, and uncertain information remained distinct, and publication or availability could be stated only when the current status and a real destination were confirmed.
- Profiles, calls to action, general 404, locale unavailable, coming soon, and destination pending remained separate states rather than being collapsed into one.
The copy was organized into fifteen proposal groups, each recording its before-and-after wording, reason for change, preserved meaning, source, status, and required approval. Seven decision items covered the primary category, brand-qualified form, Hero, emphasis on organizational function, principles, disclosure, and Sosuke's profile prose. After the CEO confirmed those choices, Shiori reviewed semantics and continuity, and Yui reviewed brand and governance integration.
Verification checked the Hero's two-beat spoken rhythm, the first-use category explanation, the concreteness of the organization language, jargon reduction, call-to-action destinations, state distinctions, unsupported claims, and the fact that English had not been authored. It found one incorrect source-inventory fingerprint and one source matrix that treated canonical sources and the in-progress semantic input as though they had the same provenance. The reference was corrected, the two types of provenance were separated, and the same checks were run again.
The primary diff was checked line by line to confirm that the behavior described above matched the change at the cutoff.
Rendering diagram…
What was confirmed
Verification results
Two artifacts—the semantic contract and the Japanese wording proposal—were applied to the target, totaling 853 lines.
All 42 copy-inventory items were mapped, together with five naming candidates, five Hero candidates, fifteen proposal groups, and seven decision items.
After the CEO's wording decisions, meaning, structure, continuity, brand, and governance were checked. The same checks passed after the source-provenance corrections.
At the cutoff, legal judgment, English locale review, URLs and availability states, site implementation, design, deployment, and publication were not complete.
Basis for completion
The wording design was considered complete when the Narrative meaning, facts, structure, and public boundaries had been fixed as a semantic contract; the Scenario Writer's expression ownership had mapped Japanese copy to all 42 items; the CEO's seven wording decisions and semantic, brand, and governance checks had completed; and the two reproducibly sourced artifacts had been applied to their target.