FACTUAL ACTIVITY RECORD · An activity record based on work that took place
Reordering activities and availability
Aligning what is currently visible, ongoing work, and non-availability in the same Japanese-English order
Purpose
When activities appeared first, visitors encountered ongoing work before they could distinguish information available on the current surface from work in progress and things not currently offered.
The narrative and implementation input needed to begin with the current public surface and keep activity, publication or availability, and future possibility distinct in both Japanese and English.
Implementation
The Current Activities and Availability section was reorganized into three parts: what visitors can currently find on the site, what is being worked on, and what is not currently offered or published there. Japanese remained the source, with English headings and body copy aligned in meaning, order, and tense.
The first part was limited to the business overview, AI-persona roles and human accountability, and published policy documents. The second was limited to questions, choices, verified changes, and non-adoption covered by the initial activity records. The third stated the negative availability that products and creative works were not individually featured, offered, or published at that time.
- Do not infer that active work is viewable or usable in the same place.
- Do not turn a non-availability statement into a future plan, release promise, coming-soon message, or roadmap.
- Add no new active call to action in the section, using only established policy navigation.
- Do not fill in unverified names, features, users, results, prices, availability, or publication dates.
Verification showed that present-tense copy saying records were being shared would conflict with their unpublished state. Publication was therefore sequenced: release the activity records first, verify their URLs, content, locales, and reachability, and only then publish the section's present-tense copy.
The content model, site narrative, message map, review status, shared input, and page input were synchronized to the same order and boundaries. References were cleaned so historical or completed premises did not remain current gates, and locale copy, classification, calls to action, publication boundaries, links, and diff consistency were checked.
The narrative source fixed the three public-facing categories in this order. This Activity ends at the information-order decision and does not include the later page implementation.
Rendering diagram…
What was confirmed
Verification results
The three-part order matched in Japanese and English: what can currently be found, what is being worked on, and what is not currently offered or published.
Current facts, activity records, and negative availability remained distinct, with no future plan, unverified claim, or new call to action added.
The conflict between unpublished records and present-tense sharing copy was addressed through a release sequence that publishes and verifies the records first.
Order, meaning, references, and publication boundaries were checked across six narrative and implementation-input areas and applied to the target. The activity-history pages and their publication verification remained a separate activity scope.
Basis for completion
The work was complete when the Japanese-English order and meaning of all three categories, current availability, non-availability, call-to-action and future-promise boundaries, and the record-first publication sequence had been applied consistently to canonical narrative and implementation inputs.